The Lifelong Learning Office of Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary publishes this blog to create and nurture a community of lifelong learners for leadership that transforms the church and the world, to invite members of that community to participate in the Lifelong Learning Programs sponsored by LPTS, to encourage formation of smaller learning communities and study groups, and to alert members to learning experiences available at other venues.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Peace Unity and Purity
Peace or purity?
Nearly half of Presbyterians put equal importance on "peace, unity and purity" in a church. But among those who give them different weight, conservatives are far more likely to pick "purity," while liberals prefer "peace." Those results are among a raft of newly released data from the Research Services of the Louisville-based Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)The results date from 2006, when the church was about to vote on recommendations from a task force whose formal name included the words in question: the Theological Task Force on Peace, Unity and Purity. The task force's recommendations served as part of the ongoing debate over role of gays in ministry -- a complicated story in its own right. But the name alone prompted the question of whether a church could really have all three of those qualities together.
Among the results:
•Some 29 percent of liberals chose peace, compared with 10 percent of conservatives.
•Only 6 percent of liberals chose purity, compared with 38 percent of conservatives.
Among both categories, however, the largest group put equal weight on the three values -- a majority of liberals and a plurality of conservatives.
Smaller percentages of each group chose unity.
Among moderates, exactly 50 percent put equal weight on the three values, with those preferring one of the three fairly evenly divided among the rest.
Large majorities believe there's a place for everyone in the denomination regardless of views on controversial issues.
That sounds like a vote for unity.
At the same time, large majorities believe that "a church that is not clear about what it believes is not worth belonging to."
My response to this, a long held conviction, that the constitutional ordination question in which one promises to uphold the "Peace Unity and Purity of the Church" is actually harmful to the church's ability to adapt to the 21st century.
"Peace" is actually a hold-over from old empire values--the Pax Romana—a peace enforce by hierarchical control. Instead of peace, we should encourage creative complexity and ability to create new structures to adapt to new times. Whenever a system moves through change from chaos, it always takes a more complex form, and with creativity, truth and goodness is increased.
"Unity" is also a hierarchically imposed focus on sameness, everybody has to agree on what to think. Heresy used to mean thinking new thoughts, now it means thinking thoughts that don't conform to the unity norm. Instead of unity we should vow to promote a respectful diversity.
"Purity" is a holdover from the post exilic emphasis in the Hebrew Scriptures when the community tended to think more about following the strict laws of the Torah instead of following the spirit of Torah which included major concern for the widow, the orphan, and the stranger in our midst. Instead of purity we need to promote a generous inclusivity, in which the circle of faith grows ever larger, drawing people in instead of circling them out.
I hope the Presbyterians will be able to move to adapt to the 21st century but I fear we're going to continue to push for the top-down values of peace, unity and purity.
Friday, December 11, 2009
New Leadership Book Welcomed

I welcome to the literature on leadership this new book by my friend and colleague Ken McFayden, Dean and Professor of Ministry and Leadership Development at Union Presbyterian Seminary in Richmond, VA. Strategic Leadership brings together Ken's deep study of attachment theory and loss with his thorough experience of church leadership through his consultations and his teaching. Three important ideas are put forth here that are not found elsewhere:
- Our response to loss is related to our levels of attachment, and our ability to overcome it depends on our good grieving and re-attachment.
- Since all change involves loss, churches seek growth without change (and wonder why it does not happen).
- Churches yearn for leadership and resist leadership at the same time.
The book provides ample lists of helpful suggestions for church leaders facing changes, losses, and the challenges of the future.
As I read the excellent analyses, I wished his editors had encouraged him to include his engaging and delightful case studies to help the reader see how leadership works in changing circumstances.
Bibliographic info:
Kenneth J. McFayden
Strategic Leadership for a Change: Facing our Losses, Finding our Future.
Alban Institute, 2009. Paper. 101 pages. $17.00. ISBN 978-1-56699-392-0
Friday, November 6, 2009
Sacred Geometry Report

Monday, September 28, 2009
2009 Labyrinth Conference
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Visiting Whitewater Valley Presbytery in Indiana
Monday, July 27, 2009
News of the death of racism is highly exaggerated
Those of us who are privileged European Americans should step up to say helpful things and promote the strength and health of the black community and the black churches.
In that light, I'm proud to point to the new initiative at my seminary, the LPTS "Black Church Studies Program" announced this spring and ready to begin this fall. See the link at http://www.lpts.edu/News-Events/article.asp?intID=321.
My colleagues on the faculty and staff, and particularly Lewis Brogdon, are to be commended for their courage and strength to persist and pursue this program for the sake of the black community and the black church!
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Do as I say not as I do: Brochure Review
